Students in Karaganda briefed on digital economy and the “People’s Construction” programme

The development of the digital economy, opportunities for young people, and oversight of infrastructure projects were discussed at Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, El.kz reports citing the Akimat of Karaganda region.

The meeting brought together members of the National Kurultai, representatives of government agencies, the Kazakhstan People’s Council, and university students.

The discussion focused on the priorities outlined in the Address of President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.

Member of Parliament Askhat Aimagambetov stated that political and governance reforms should translate into tangible outcomes that people can experience in their everyday lives. He also addressed young people, highlighting the opportunities available to them in education and professional development.

“Young people today have significant prospects. The state is creating the necessary conditions to support them, while the Address sets out the strategic priorities for the country’s development. However, the key task now is to ensure that political and institutional reforms deliver concrete results that make a tangible difference to every citizen,” Askhat Aimagambetov said.

Vice Minister of Labour and Social Protection of the Population Bakhtiyar Zhazykpayev presented the concept of the people’s digital economy. According to its proponents, the adoption of digital technologies and artificial intelligence is intended to expand employment and entrepreneurship opportunities, while also contributing to income growth.

Another topic on the agenda was the “People’s Construction” programme.

Participants discussed plans to upgrade roads, utility networks, and social infrastructure facilities. Particular attention was given to transparency in public expenditure and public participation in monitoring infrastructure projects.

At the end of the meeting, representatives of the National Kurultai and government agencies answered questions from students. The meeting report did not specify implementation timelines for the infrastructure projects or the amounts of funding allocated.